Voter Fraud and the Straw Man

           

According to a Department of Justice analysis, out of 197,000,000 votes cast in federal elections between 2002 and 2005. only 40 voters have been indicted for fraud.  With a calculator and some basic number-crunching the fraud rate turns out to be a sub-microscopic .00002%.
          Yet despite this rather trifling tally, one political party has chosen to make voter fraud an issue, big enough to engage entire states and, beyond that, regions of states. To one school of thought, it is an insidious phenomenon, capable of enveloping huge portions of the electorate, and corrupting a primary privilege of citizenship.  Enter the Straw Man.
             The Straw Man,in reality is an argument; an argument that requires the reader or listener to suspend recollection and belief of the original premise.  It has been used for ages in debate; particularly with regards to emotionally-charged issues.  The tactic makes use of exaggeration, misrepresentation. and, if all else fails,  total fabrication.  An example might be, candidate Dick believes that more county tax revenue should be allocated to restoration of highways and roads.  Candidate Jane responds that she is sorry to hear that Dick is opposed to funding for the sheriff's patrols.  In the case of voter fraud, one particular party has become rather, shall we say "cozy" with the Straw Man.
             For our purposes,  we'll refrain from naming political parties in this post.  Instead, we will refer to them by their color of preference.  The party which espouses the existence of this "grainy guy" we'll call the "Party of Red".  The party which considers him a myth we'll designate as the "Party of Blue".  As to the those who sniff the prevailing winds of sentiment during election years, and fluctuate between Red and Blue will be referred to as "Purple People".
                                                            ~Back to the chase~
             The Straw Man is "an undocumented" who takes advantage of alleged lax voter regulations.  To allow such an abuse to continue, so the thinking goes, is to jeopardize the integrity of the entire electoral process.  An organization which calls itself "True the Vote" cites a statistic that there are "1.8 million dead voters still eligible on the rolls across the country."  And if there are that many, as the reasoning seems to lead, there are 1.8 million potential abuses.  This publication states further that "2.75 million voters are registered in more than one state". 
          In both of these arguments, post hoc, ergo propter hoc, comes into play.  Translated: after this, because of this.  In other words, if this  is caused then this can be the only possible effect.  It is a fallacy introduced to this writer in Logic 101, many moons ago.  These statistics are used to lead the reader to conclude that there are four and a half million votes out there, ready to be grabbed, like so much low-hanging fruit.
          The Straw Man, in this voter fraud scenario is a person without valid documentation who exercises a right of citizenship which is not legitimately his.  He lacks a birth certificate ($10-$45), or a passport ($85), or certified naturalization papers ($19.95).  He might also lack other resources (transportation, language skills, advice) to acquire any of these documents.  As this scenario plays out, the only asset he may have working for him is the cunning to leverage the system and score a vote to which he is not entitled.
         Another tenet of Logic 101 that has stood the test of time is that it's impossible to prove, beyond a shadow of doubt, that something does not exist.  That is a rock which theologically has stood the test of time.So, it is impossible to argue the non-existence of straw men, but in the real world those most affected by more stringent voting regulations are not those who vote on behalf of dead people, or those who fly from state to state to tilt election outcomes. Rather, they are those who number amongst the poor, the elderly, the minorities, the students. Those without a powerful advocate to speak on their behalf.
           The reality is that twelve percent of voting age people have no form of valid voter identification.  The reality is that voter id laws are seen by some as a modern form of poll tax, as many of the country's poorest will not be able to vote due to a lack of proper state-issued identification.  The reality is that in states governed by "Purple People", the "Party of Red"has sanctioned voter id laws to prevent the "Party of Blue" from gaining control of state legislatures.
             The reality for your scribe is that the last six words of our nation's pledge to the flag sound rather hollow, at the moment.